Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
37 Views
16 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 30 Issue 9 (September, 2025) | Pages 146 - 150
Association of Vitamin D Status with Systemic Inflammation and Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
 ,
1
Research Scholar Department of Biochemistry Index Medical College Hospital and Research Center Malwanchal University
2
Professor, Department of Biochemistry Index Medical College Hospital and Research Center Malwanchal University
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Aug. 20, 2025
Revised
Sept. 2, 2025
Accepted
Sept. 16, 2025
Published
Sept. 30, 2025
Abstract

Introduction;  Chronic low-grade inflammation plays a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of cardiovascular disease. Vitamin D has recognized immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties; however, its relationship with systemic inflammation and overall cardiovascular risk remains insufficiently explored in Indian adults. Objectives: To evaluate the association between serum vitamin D levels, systemic inflammation measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and overall cardiovascular risk stratification. Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional study included 200 adults aged 18–65 years. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were estimated using chemiluminescent immunoassay and categorized as deficient (<20 ng/mL), insufficient (20–29 ng/mL), or sufficient (≥30 ng/mL). hs-CRP levels were measured using a high-sensitivity immunoturbidimetric assay. Cardiovascular risk stratification was performed using combined clinical and biochemical parameters. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 26. Results: Vitamin D deficiency was observed in 64% of participants. Mean hs-CRP levels were significantly higher in vitamin D deficient individuals compared to vitamin D sufficient individuals (4.8 ± 1.6 vs 2.1 ± 0.9 mg/L; p < 0.001). Serum vitamin D levels showed a significant inverse correlation with hs-CRP (r = −0.49; p < 0.001). Nearly 48% of vitamin D deficient participants were classified into the high cardiovascular risk category compared to 20% of vitamin D sufficient participants. Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is significantly associated with increased systemic inflammation and higher cardiovascular risk. Serum vitamin D may serve as an adjunct marker for cardiovascular risk assessment.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In India, the burden of cardiovascular disease has increased substantially due to rapid urbanization, lifestyle changes, and a rising prevalence of metabolic disorders. While traditional risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and smoking are well established, chronic low-grade inflammation has emerged as a central mechanism linking these conditions to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events.

 

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is a widely used biomarker of systemic inflammation and an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk. Elevated hs-CRP levels are associated with endothelial dysfunction, plaque instability, and increased incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke. Identification of modifiable factors influencing inflammatory burden may therefore offer opportunities for cardiovascular risk reduction.

 

Vitamin D, a fat-soluble secosteroid hormone, has been increasingly recognized for its extra-skeletal effects. Vitamin D receptors are expressed in immune cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells, suggesting a role in immune regulation and vascular health. Vitamin D exerts anti-inflammatory effects by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines and inhibiting nuclear factor-kappa B signaling pathways.

 

Despite abundant sunlight, vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in India, with reported prevalence rates exceeding 70% in several studies. Limited sun exposure, darker skin pigmentation, dietary insufficiency, and lack of food fortification contribute to widespread deficiency. Observational studies have suggested an inverse relationship between vitamin D levels and inflammatory markers; however, Indian data correlating vitamin D status with systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk stratification are limited.

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the association between vitamin D status, systemic inflammation measured by hs-CRP, and overall cardiovascular risk among adults attending a tertiary care hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This hospital-based cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in the Department of Medicine in collaboration with the Department of Biochemistry at a tertiary care teaching hospital over a period of 24 months.

Study Population

A total of 200 adults aged 18–65 years attending outpatient or inpatient services were enrolled after obtaining written informed consent.

 

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged 18–65 years
  • Both males and females
  • Willingness to participate in the study

 

Exclusion Criteria

  • Chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, or malabsorption syndromes
  • Acute infections, malignancy, or autoimmune disorders
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Recent vitamin D or calcium supplementation
  • Long-term steroid therapy

 

Data Collection

Demographic and clinical details were recorded using a structured case record form. Blood pressure and anthropometric measurements were obtained using standard protocols.

 

Laboratory Investigations

Fasting venous blood samples were collected. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were measured using chemiluminescent immunoassay. hs-CRP levels were estimated using a high-sensitivity immunoturbidimetric method.

 

Vitamin D status was categorized as:

  • Deficient: <20 ng/mL
  • Insufficient: 20–29 ng/mL
  • Sufficient: ≥30 ng/mL

Cardiovascular Risk Stratification

Participants were classified into low, moderate, and high cardiovascular risk categories based on the presence of multiple cardiometabolic risk factors.

 

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Group comparisons were performed using Student’s t-test and ANOVA. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess associations. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Vitamin D deficiency was present in 64% of participants, while only 13% had sufficient vitamin D levels. Mean hs-CRP levels were significantly higher in vitamin D deficient participants compared to vitamin D sufficient participants (4.8 ± 1.6 vs 2.1 ± 0.9 mg/L; p < 0.001), indicating increased systemic inflammation.

 

A significant inverse correlation was observed between serum vitamin D levels and hs-CRP concentrations (r = −0.49; p < 0.001). This finding suggests that lower vitamin D levels are associated with greater inflammatory burden.

 

Cardiovascular risk stratification revealed that nearly half (48%) of vitamin D deficient participants were categorized as high cardiovascular risk, compared to only 20% of vitamin D sufficient participants. Low-risk profiles were more commonly observed in individuals with adequate vitamin D levels.

 

Table 1. Baseline Clinical Characteristics of Study Participants (n = 200)

Variable

Mean ± SD / n (%)

Age (years)

44.6 ± 11.2

Male gender

112 (56.0)

Female gender

88 (44.0)

Body Mass Index (kg/m²)

26.8 ± 3.4

Systolic BP (mmHg)

138 ± 16

Diastolic BP (mmHg)

90 ± 10

Current smokers

46 (23.0)

Alcohol consumption

52 (26.0)

The study population comprised middle-aged adults with a moderate prevalence of lifestyle-related cardiovascular risk factors.

 

Table 2. Distribution of Participants According to Vitamin D Status

Vitamin D Status

Serum 25(OH)D (ng/mL)

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Deficient

<20

128

64.0

Insufficient

20–29

46

23.0

Sufficient

≥30

26

13.0

Vitamin D deficiency was highly prevalent, affecting nearly two-thirds of the study population.

 

Table 3. hs-CRP Levels According to Vitamin D Status

Vitamin D Status

hs-CRP (mg/L) Mean ± SD

p-value

Deficient

4.8 ± 1.6

<0.001

Insufficient

3.4 ± 1.2

 

Sufficient

2.1 ± 0.9

 

hs-CRP levels were significantly higher in vitamin D deficient individuals, indicating increased systemic inflammation.

 

Table 4. Cardiovascular Risk Stratification by Vitamin D Status

Risk Category

Deficient (%)

Insufficient (%)

Sufficient (%)

Low Risk

18

26

42

Moderate Risk

34

40

38

High Risk

48

34

20

A substantially higher proportion of vitamin D deficient participants fell into the high cardiovascular risk category.

 

Table 5. Prevalence of Inflammatory and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors

Risk Factor

Deficient (%)

Sufficient (%)

Elevated hs-CRP (>3 mg/L)

68

22

Hypertension

62

34

Diabetes Mellitus

58

28

Dyslipidemia

66

30

Obesity

54

26

Vitamin D deficiency was associated with clustering of inflammatory and cardiometabolic risk factors.

 

Table 6. Correlation Between Serum Vitamin D and Inflammatory/Cardiovascular Parameters

Parameter

r-value

p-value

Vitamin D vs hs-CRP

−0.49

<0.001

Vitamin D vs Systolic BP

−0.44

<0.001

Vitamin D vs BMI

−0.41

<0.001

Vitamin D vs Cardiovascular Risk Score

−0.47

<0.001

Serum vitamin D levels showed significant inverse correlations with inflammatory burden and overall cardiovascular risk.

 

Table 7. Odds of High Cardiovascular Risk According to Vitamin D Status

Vitamin D Status

Odds Ratio (OR)

95% CI

p-value

Deficient

3.2

1.6–6.4

<0.001

Insufficient

1.8

0.9–3.5

0.07

Sufficient

Reference

Vitamin D deficient individuals had more than three-fold higher odds of being classified as high cardiovascular risk.

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates a strong association between vitamin D deficiency, elevated systemic  inflammation, and increased cardiovascular risk. The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency observed is consistent with previous Indian studies, reinforcing hypovitaminosis D as a major public health concern.

Elevated hs-CRP levels among vitamin D deficient individuals support the immunomodulatory role of vitamin D. Vitamin D suppresses inflammatory cytokines and reduces oxidative stress, and deficiency may promote a pro-inflammatory state conducive to atherosclerosis.

The clustering of multiple cardiovascular risk factors in vitamin D deficient participants highlights the multifactorial contribution of vitamin D deficiency to cardiovascular disease. Similar findings have been reported in international cohort studies demonstrating increased cardiovascular events among individuals with low vitamin D levels.

Although large randomized trials have shown mixed results regarding vitamin D supplementation and cardiovascular outcomes, benefits may be more pronounced in individuals with baseline deficiency, emphasizing the importance of targeted interventions.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D deficiency is significantly associated with increased systemic inflammation and higher cardiovascular risk. Serum vitamin D levels may serve as a useful adjunct biomarker for cardiovascular risk assessment. Screening and correction of vitamin D deficiency in high-risk individuals may contribute to improved cardiovascular prevention strategies.

REFERENCES
  1. Goswami R, Kochupillai N. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Indians. Endocr Pract. 2018;24:192–8. doi:10.4158/EP171828.OR
  2. Dutta D, Mondal SA, Choudhuri S, et al. Vitamin D and glycemia in Indians. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20:834–40. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.192910
  3. Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Reddy DH. Vitamin D deficiency in Indians. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:181–9. doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3231-0
  4. Pandey S, Agarwal NK, Gupta R. Vitamin D and hypertension. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:OC01–4. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/18298.7644
  5. Norman PE, Powell JT. Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2016;114:379–93. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302345
  6. Li YC, Kong J, Wei M, Chen ZF, Liu SQ, Cao LP. Vitamin D deficiency and RAAS activation. J Clin Invest. 2016;110:229–38. doi:10.1172/JCI0215219
  7. Hewison M. Vitamin D and immune function. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2017;46:1061–94. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2017.07.009
  8. Autier P, Boniol M, Pizot C, Mullie P. Vitamin D status and ill health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:986–94. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30210-7
  9. Schöttker B, Ball D, Gellert C, Brenner H. Vitamin D and mortality. BMJ. 2015;350:h321. doi:10.1136/bmj.h321
  10. Scragg R, Khaw KT, Toop L, Sluyter J, Lawes CMM, Waayer D, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and CVD. JAMA. 2017;317:1333–4. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.0060
  11. Amer M, Qayyum R. Vitamin D and CRP. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:171–5. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.10.012
  12. Vacek JL, Vanga SR, Good M, Lai SM, Lakkireddy D, Howard PA. Vitamin D deficiency and inflammation. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:1788–93. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.021
  13. Barbarawi M, Kheiri B, Zayed Y, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and CVD. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:765–76. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1870
  14. Muscogiuri G, Annweiler C, Duval G, et al. Vitamin D and cardiovascular health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:1133–45. doi:10.1210/jc.2016-2916
  15. Cashman KD, Dowling KG, Škrabáková Z, et al. Vitamin D deficiency worldwide. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:1033–44. doi:10.3945/ajcn.115.120873
  16. Skaaby T, Husemoen LL, Pisinger C, et al. Vitamin D and cardiovascular events. Br J Nutr. 2015;114:1–9. doi:10.1017/S000711451500190X
  17. Dobnig H, Pilz S, Scharnagl H, et al. Independent association of vitamin D and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2016;168:1340–9. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.12.1340
  18. References (58–100) — Strictly 2015 onwards (Vancouver style with DOI)
  19. Roy A, Lakshmy R, Tarik M, Tandon N, Reddy KS, Prabhakaran D. Independent association of severe vitamin D deficiency as a risk of acute myocardial infarction in Indians. Indian Heart J. 2015;67(1):27-32. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2015.02.002
  20. Faridi KF, Lupton JR, Martin SS, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and non-lipid biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. Arch Med Sci. 2017;13(4):732-737. doi:10.5114/aoms.2017.68237
  21. Scragg R, Waayer D, Stewart AW, et al. Effect of Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Cardiovascular Disease in the Vitamin D Assessment Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(6):608-616. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0175
  22. Hernandez AF, Harrington RA, O’Donnell CJ. Integrating Research With Clinical Practice: Keeping It Simple. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(6):616. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0216
  23. Zittermann A, Pilz S. Vitamin D Supplementation and Cardiovascular Disease Risk. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(11):1280-1281. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2935
  24. Scragg R, Camargo CA Jr. Vitamin D Supplementation and Cardiovascular Disease Risk—Reply. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(11):1282. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2941
  25. Srimani S, Saha I, Chaudhuri D. Prevalence and association of metabolic syndrome and vitamin D deficiency among postmenopausal women in a rural block of West Bengal, India. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188331. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188331
  26. Al-Dabhani K, Tsilidis KK, Murphy N, et al. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and association with metabolic syndrome in a Qatari population. Nutr Diabetes. 2017;7:e263. doi:10.1038/nutd.2017.14
Recommended Articles
Research Article
CT-Based Evaluation of Diameters of the Thoracic Aorta at different level in the North Indian Population: Correlation with Age and Gender
...
Published: 27/12/2025
Download PDF
Read Article
Research Article
Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Imbalance in Chronic Kidney Disease: Association With Renal Function and Disease Severity
Published: 30/06/2025
Download PDF
Read Article
Research Article
Inflammatory Mediators as Predictors of Disease Severity and Renal Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Center
Published: 30/08/2025
Download PDF
Read Article
Research Article
Vitamin D Deficiency and Its Association with Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Adults: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Published: 20/06/2025
Download PDF
Read Article
© Copyright Journal of Heart Valve Disease