Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
130 Views
0 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 17 Issue 1 (None, 2011) | Pages 1 - 13
The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins on the progression of aortic sclerosis and mortality
1
Division of Cardiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1760, USA. rardehali@mednet.ucla.edu
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
DOI : 10.61336
Published
May 16, 2012
Abstract

Background and aim of the study

Although aortic sclerosis has been associated with an increase in adverse cardiovascular outcomes, no proven therapy has been shown to slow its progression to overt aortic stenosis (AS). Thus, the hypothesis was assessed that treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or statins may be associated with an improvement in the clinical outcome of these patients.

Methods

A total of 4,105 patients with evidence of aortic sclerosis seen on transthoracic echocardiography (defined as thickening or calcification with a mean valve gradient ≤15 mmHg) was identified. Patients with a sclerotic valve who were treated with ACE-Is/ARBs or statins were followed for a mean period of 1,078 ± 615 days. After adjustment for the propensity to receive ACE-Is/ARBs or statins, mortality, hemodynamic progression to AS, hospitalization for ischemic heart disease (IHD), and congestive heart failure (CHF) were assessed and related to the medical treatment.

Results

At baseline, patients with aortic sclerosis who were treated with an ACE-I/ARB or a statin suffered significantly more from comorbidities such as IHD, CHF, hypertension, diabetes, and peripheral arterial disease, when compared to subjects with sclerotic valves not treated with these drugs. After adjustment for confounding factors, treatment with statins was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% CI 0.56–0.98, p = 0.001), admission for IHD (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66–0.99, p = 0.03), admission for CHF (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55–0.85, p = 0.01) and progression to AS (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42–0.97, p = 0.03). While ACE-I treatment resulted in a significant reduction in admission for IHD (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65–0.98, p = 0.03) and CHF (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.94, p = 0.01), the beneficial trend towards reduced mortality and delayed progression to AS was not significant.

Conclusion

Treatment of this patient population with statins led to a significant reduction in mortality and also slowed the progression to AS - an effect that was not statistically significant with ACE-I treatment.

Recommended Articles
© Copyright Journal of Heart Valve Disease